Keywords: PTSD, posttraumatic stress, DSM-IV, DSM-5, diagnostic concordance.Ĭoncordancia diagnóstica entre DSM-IV y DSM-5 para el Trastorno de Estrés Postraumático (TEPT) en una muestra clínica. Differences between the diagnoses are due to the new defi nition of C (avoidance) and D (negative alterations in cognitions and mood) in the DSM-5. Conclusions: A withinsubjects concordance analysis showed high agreement for PTSD diagnosis between the two classifi cations. Conversely, individuals who were diagnosed with the DSM-5 criteria and not with the DSM-IV criteria presented cognitive avoidance and alterations in cognition not included in the DSM-IV criteria. The analysis of the non-concordant individuals revealed that individuals who were diagnosed according to the DSM-IV criteria but not the DSM-5 criteria were primarily indirect victims. Results: The presence of cognitive avoidance was a determinant in the PTSD DSM-5 diagnosis (86% positive predictive value). PTSD diagnosis was established using the Global Scale for Posttraumatic Stress (EGEP), a self-report measure to assess PTSD. Method: The study assessed 166 people over 18 who had experienced at least one traumatic event. Furthermore, analyses are conducted to establish the features of participants with no concordant diagnoses. Background: The present study aims to analyze diagnostic concordance between the DSM-IV and the DSM-5 for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnostic criteria and their different groups of symptoms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |